8/9/2023 0 Comments F1 2017 rule changes![]() ![]() There is a proposal to cut the number of permitted engines per driver per season to three from five this year. Cost - Customer engine prices, which currently range from about 18-23m euros, will be reduced by each manufacturer by 1m euros in 2017 and then come down to a fixed 12m euros from 2018. ![]() While details are still subject to tweaking, it is as follows: Over the Chinese Grand Prix last weekend, Red Bull team boss Christian Horner said the manufacturers were "nowhere near" achieving this - and that as a result the alternative engine idea was back on the table.īut Mercedes F1 boss Toto Wolff said the manufacturers were "pretty much there" and sources close to the manufacturers say this is a more accurate representation of the reality.īBC Sport can reveal that an agreement over engines has basically been reached. This stand-off led to the manufacturers agreeing with governing body the FIA in December on four targets: cheaper engines, guaranteed supply, performance convergence and better noise. There were no prizes for guessing how that formula would be skewed. Last autumn, Ecclestone even threatened to introduce a cheap alternative engine into F1, to run alongside the hybrids under an equivalency formula. It didn't help that having demonstrably the best engine led to Mercedes domination. The 85-year-old feels the hybrids are too expensive, unnecessarily complex for F1 and sound bad. The progress is breathtaking - and the technology will soon filter into road cars, with obvious benefits.īut not everyone is a fan - most notably F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone. ![]() If that sounds like hyperbole, consider this: until 2013, F1 engines - and pretty much every other petrol engine - had converted fuel-energy into performance at about 29% efficiency.Īfter just over two years of racing in F1, the new turbo hybrids are close to 50% efficiency - and over it when the energy recovery system is on full deployment. The turbo hybrid V6 'power-units' introduced into F1 in 2014 are masterpieces of technology that have produced a revolutionary step forward in the performance of the internal combustion engine. Equalising engines The efficiency achieved with the new hybrid engines has been breathtaking, but Bernie Ecclestone is still not a fan And they became - and remain - very political.īut with the end-of-April deadline for completion looming, a resolution is in sight. The disputes have been about all aspects of the car - chassis, engine and tyres. Wide scale weight reduction isn't really viable, but one way to alleviate the issue is to increase downforce and change the approach to cornering forces, which is what we are going to see in 2017.Falling TV audiences and a poisonous atmosphere within the sport have led to the acceptance that something has to change.Īnd now, finally, F1's bosses are poised to sign off on a set of new regulations that they hope will guarantee a rosier future for the next few years, with faster cars, happier drivers, better racing and less financial strain on smaller teams. This is due to the weight increase of the suspension and brake elements, accommodating the increase in size, weight and inertia of the wheels and tyres. This becomes more of a problem when you realise in dry weight, ie qualifying trim, they are currently 60kg heavier, which is set to rise a further 20kg in 2017 (722kg). This is chiefly due to the weight and packaging of the extra power unit components. The cars are carrying around 50kg's less fuel at the start of a race, yet they are still much heavier than their V8 counterparts. One of the key problems the sport has had since 2014 is weight. That said, the intention was to reduce lap times by up to five seconds, something that should be easily accomplished in this framework, with lap and pole records likely to tumble at every GP.įears of cars not being able to follow one another should be heeded, however, because the way in which the front and rear wings have been designed should mitigate any increase in downforce, simply by changing the car's wake profile and the front wing's sensitivity. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |